![]() It has all the components of the Latin Theatre by Vitruvius: the cavea (semicircular tiers), side access and stage wall flanked parascenia. Built at the beginning of the Christian era, it owes its reputation to the remarkable preservation of its stage wall. Orange became an independent county in the 11th century and later passed to the House of Nassau.Įxceptional witness of the UNESCO World Heritage Site, the ancient theater of Orange is the best preserved in Europe. This because the Church opposed what it regarded as uncivilized spectacles. As the Roman Empire declined during the 4th century, by which time Christianity had become the official religion, the theatre was closed by official edict in 391 AD. The amphitheatre, probably built during the reign of Augustus (27 BC), is the best preserved of its kind. It is a fact that one of the great Roman roads, the “Via Agrippa”, connecting Lyon to Arles, passed on the land, close to the Rhône, between Châteauneuf, Sorgues and Orange.Īrausio expanded around the existing Roman remnants for which this area is famous. These include clay, glass, bronze and iron objects, as well are bones, jewelry and coins in bronze, which were found in a vineyard in Châteauneuf in the lieu-dit Bois Sénéchal (in the eastern sector). Various objects from Roman times have been discovered in this area. Thus Orange hosted the veterans of the Second Legion who also settled in the territories of Mondragon, Uchaux and in the hills of Châteauneuf. In recognition of service, veterans received plots of land. During the Roman Empire, 120 BC to AD 476, the village farms, and large rural holdings increased. ![]() Orange was the capital of a wide area of northern Provence, which was parceled up into lots for the Roman colonists. A major battle, which is known as the Battle of Arausio, was fought in 105 BC between two Roman armies and the Cimbri and Teutones tribes. (once again, in my opinion).Previous Celtic settlements existed in and around Orange. It's an incredible story but just incredible enough to be credible. The senate and consular commanders would order men to their deaths and seemingly viewed it as their right.Īnyone unfamiliar with Sertorius should be certain to read about his taking of two (2) cities in one day in Spain. In my subjective opinion I believe his empathy posed an existential threat to the established order. Sertorius was almost "frugal" compared to his contemporaries in this sense. And from all accounts it appears he demonstrated a previously unheard of concern and for his soldier's lives. Specifically, Sertorius waged nonconventional tactics that allowed him to choose the terms of engagement. It was a lesson he carried with him throughout his military career. What's important is that he appreciated and valued surviving. Regardless of how many others survived it is obvious that Sertorius did survive. Sertorius witnessed the hubris of one commander result in the butchering of tens of thousands of his fellow soldiers (allegedly only a handful of soldiers survived). The best thing to come out of that slaughter was Sertorius. Any departure from meritocracy at the institutional level will invariably lead to collapse of that system. ![]() The fact that a proconsul refused to fall in line because the Consul was not an optimate is completely bogus. But this is just my opinion.Īrausio was a Cannae level disaster. The greatest reforms post-Arausio was forced on the State by Sulla. So I wouldn't call enforcing the chain of command as a radical reform. In fairness the rank of Consul was always higher than Pro Consul.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |